01 September 2006

Saving Happy Gilmore

See it here.

Today's panel wants to pretend it is about a desire for comedy over drama, presumably because comedy does not require as much introspection or effort from the audience.

But in the end it's actually a metaphor for a larger tension between comedy and drama. It is a requiem for celebrities who won't stay in the pigeon holes we have assigned them, preferring to wriggle free to transform themselves and their careers. It is a lament for the shattered fans they leave in their wake when they abandon what is familiar and safe and venture into the unknown.

Tom Hanks, noted goofball comedy actor from the early to mid-80's (Bachelor Party, Big), made a career transition starting with a role in Bonfire of the Vanities and later Philadelphia. By 2006, he is best known for his work in serious movies, something which contemporary fans of Dragnet could never have predicted.

In making that transition, Hanks did not spare a thought for the people whose sense of identify and self-worth were tied up in being fans of Tom Hanks, comedy actor. People who wore their fandom as an iconoclastic badge of honor were betrayed when he went "mainstream" and proved he could do serious drama work.

Hanks is the seminal modern offender by dint of having succeeded in the transition where others failed. Robin Williams and Jim Carrey spring to mind, men who tried desperately to make the change but in the end only succeeded in damaging their own careers. They ended by losing much of their comedy fan base without gaining a drama fan base to replace them.

Burl and Joy, we can assume, were among the fans of early Tom Hanks, but now feel betrayed and alone. Until along came Adam Sandler to tickle their funny bones and fill the void once again. They can only hope that Punch-Drunk Love is not the beginning of the end.

You've got marginalia:
  • Is it just me or are Burl and Joy the wrong demographic to be Adam Sandler fans?
  • Unless the woopee cushion reference is an unbelievably oblique (and mis-spelled) pun on Whoopi Goldberg, its purpose in the panel is mysterious to say the least.
  • The Dinette Set is completely obsessed with Cialis, a fact which makes me a little queasy.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

What's the signifacance of "Lost in Translation" starring the ex-goofball comedy star Bill Murray? Also, why take little Timmy to Deer Hunter?

Anonymous said...

It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply
with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (the text of which can be found
at the U.S. Copyright Office website: http://lcWeb.loc.gov/copyright/ )
and other applicable intellectual property laws, which may include
removing or disabling access to material claimed to be the subject of
infringing activity.

To file a notice of infringement with us, you must provide a written
communication (by fax or regular mail, not by email) that sets forth the
items specified below. Please note that pursuant to that Act, you may be
liable to the alleged infringer for damages (including costs and
attorneys' fees) if you materially misrepresent that you own an item when
you in fact do not. Indeed, in a recent case (please see
http://www.onlinepolicy.org/action/legpolicy/opg_v_diebold/ for more
information), a company that sent an infringement notification seeking
removal of online materials that were protected by the fair use doctrine
was ordered to pay such costs and attorneys fees. The company agreed to
pay over $100,000. Accordingly, if you are not sure whether material
available online infringes your copyright, we suggest that you first
contact an attorney.

To expedite our ability to process your request, please use the following
format (including section numbers):

1. Identify in sufficient detail the copyrighted work that you believe has
been infringed upon. This must include identification of specific posts,
as opposed to entire sites. Posts must be referenced by either the dates
in which they appear or the permalink of the post. For example,
http://example.blogspot.com/archives/2003_01_21_example_archive.html#2104575.

2. Identify the material that you claim is infringing upon the copyrighted
work listed in item #1 above.

YOU MUST IDENTIFY EACH POST BY PERMALINK OR DATE THAT ALLEGEDLY CONTAINS
INFRINGING MATERIAL. The permalink for a post is usually found by clicking
on the timestamp of the post.

3. Provide information reasonably sufficient to permit Blogger to contact
you (email address is preferred).

4. Include the following statement: "I have a good faith belief that use
of the copyrighted materials described above on the allegedly infringing
web pages is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the
law."